The pattern: output contract + verification
If you want prompts to “feel less AI”, the biggest lever is forcing structure and requiring checks. It reduces rambling and makes responses easier to scan.
Output contract
Define headings/JSON schema, length, and what to do when info is missing.
Verification
Ask for a self-check list: missing inputs, assumptions, and edge cases.
Copy-paste templates
Short, direct prompts. Replace bracketed parts with your details.
1) “Do the task” with explicit output
Open builder →You are helping with: [task].
Inputs:
- Context: [what you’re working on]
- Constraints: [deadlines, tools, rules]
- What I can provide: [files, links, data]
Output contract:
- Format: [headings / JSON schema / checklist]
- Length: [short/medium/long]
- If information is missing: ask 3–5 targeted questions (no more).
Now do the task.2) Add a verification pass (reduces confident mistakes)
Before finalizing, run a verification pass:
- List assumptions you made (bullet points).
- Identify 3 likely failure modes.
- For each failure mode, add one mitigation.
Then provide the final answer in the agreed output contract.3) Writing prompt that avoids “AI tone”
Write: [piece type] for [audience] about [topic].
Style constraints:
- No hype words (e.g., "revolutionary", "game-changing", "unmatched").
- Prefer concrete nouns and short sentences.
- Use specifics: numbers, steps, examples.
- If something is uncertain, say "unknown" and explain what would confirm it.
Output:
- Title
- 3–6 short sections with headings
- A short checklist at the endWant more templates?
Use the existing category pages. They’re more specific than any “GPT‑6 prompt” mega-list.